{"id":19033,"date":"2018-09-17T22:20:06","date_gmt":"2018-09-17T21:20:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bubblegen.co.uk\/~matt\/blog\/?p=19033"},"modified":"2018-10-03T20:09:41","modified_gmt":"2018-10-03T19:09:41","slug":"results-are-in","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mframes.org\/photo\/2018\/09\/17\/results-are-in\/","title":{"rendered":"results are in"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Last of the roll of Fuji Acros 100. All test shots came out ok and the bellows are definitely much better, and probably 90% fixed. All the scans I received seemed to be much brighter than I was expecting, which was somewhat strange. I know the meter on the Makina works fine and I exposed for the shadows in pretty much all the photos I took with the camera set to ASA\/ISO 100. Quite a few scenes had a high amount of dynamic range so it&#8217;s conceivable that this played a part in some of the scans looking really over exposed. But I&#8217;m not 100% convinced. Then there&#8217;s the obviously &#8216;digital looking&#8217; (almost cartoonified) artefacts in the areas of some scans which have subtle tonal shifts. I&#8217;m really happy that the Makina&#8217;s bellows have less holes in them (although not fixed completely), but something is niggling me about all the Acros 100 scans that I received. As I wrote previously, I&#8217;ll have to ride this one and see how it goes&#8230;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">As example of the brightness, here&#8217;s shot that I had to try and make darker:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-19035\" src=\"https:\/\/media-wplib.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com\/photo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/12024501\/Lear_0699-08-586x474.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"586\" height=\"474\" srcset=\"https:\/\/media-wplib.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com\/photo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/12024501\/Lear_0699-08-586x474.jpg 586w, https:\/\/media-wplib.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com\/photo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/12024501\/Lear_0699-08-150x121.jpg 150w, https:\/\/media-wplib.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com\/photo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/12024501\/Lear_0699-08-279x226.jpg 279w, https:\/\/media-wplib.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com\/photo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/12024501\/Lear_0699-08-768x621.jpg 768w, https:\/\/media-wplib.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com\/photo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/12024501\/Lear_0699-08-989x800.jpg 989w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 586px) 100vw, 586px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">This is the original:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-19039\" src=\"https:\/\/media-wplib.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com\/photo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/12023559\/Lear_0699-08-1-586x474.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"586\" height=\"474\" srcset=\"https:\/\/media-wplib.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com\/photo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/12023559\/Lear_0699-08-1-586x474.jpg 586w, https:\/\/media-wplib.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com\/photo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/12023559\/Lear_0699-08-1-150x121.jpg 150w, https:\/\/media-wplib.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com\/photo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/12023559\/Lear_0699-08-1-279x226.jpg 279w, https:\/\/media-wplib.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com\/photo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/12023559\/Lear_0699-08-1-768x621.jpg 768w, https:\/\/media-wplib.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com\/photo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/12023559\/Lear_0699-08-1-989x800.jpg 989w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 586px) 100vw, 586px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">There&#8217;s almost a touch of infrared about it! Over developed? And maybe a problem with the scanner being able to cope with the tonal range of the black and white 6&#215;7 negatives? Dunno&#8230;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">So&#8230;in terms of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/mframes.org\/photo\/2018\/08\/29\/a-bit-of-a-problem\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the problems<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Light leaks? &#8211; Better and probably non-existent in the results of the test roll (black and white is more forgiving though). But it looks positive :-)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Strange border round the edges of some images?\u00a0 &#8211; Better, but not gone completely (you can still see it on the bottom and right hand side of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/mframes.org\/photo\/2018\/09\/17\/plunge-pool-reflection\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">this photo<\/a> and also the photo at the top of this post).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Overall, it&#8217;s good and I&#8217;m happy. I was even happier when I looked at the scans for the first time on Saturday because I had already shot two rolls of Ilford HP5 and only had a few shots left in my third roll! As I wrote previously, I was cautiously optimistic (and confident) in my repair skill :-)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">In other news, the new bellows should be winging their way to me from Japan in the next week or so, then it&#8217;ll be time to send the Makina off for repair and CLA. When it comes back from that, I will be very excited indeed :-)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last of the roll of Fuji Acros 100. All test shots came out ok and the bellows are definitely much better, and probably 90% fixed. All the scans I received seemed to be much brighter than I was expecting, which was somewhat strange. I know the meter on the Makina works fine and I exposed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":28350,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[130],"tags":[840,193,790,843,844,821,835,837,662,836],"class_list":["post-19033","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-photography","tag-6x7","tag-bw","tag-film","tag-fuji-neopan-acros-100","tag-helicopter","tag-labscan","tag-makina670","tag-medium-format","tag-photoblog","tag-writeup"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mframes.org\/photo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19033","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mframes.org\/photo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mframes.org\/photo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mframes.org\/photo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mframes.org\/photo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19033"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/mframes.org\/photo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19033\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19042,"href":"https:\/\/mframes.org\/photo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19033\/revisions\/19042"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mframes.org\/photo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28350"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mframes.org\/photo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19033"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mframes.org\/photo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19033"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mframes.org\/photo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}